[Proposal for the delineation of postoperative primary clinical target volumes in maxillary sinus and nasal cavity cancers]. / Proposition de délinéation des volumes cibles anatomocliniques postopératoires de la tumeur primitive des cancers du sinus maxillaire et des cavités nasales.

In this article, we propose a consensus delineation of postoperative clinical target volumes for the primary tumour in maxillary sinus and nasal cavity cancers. These guidelines are developed based on radioanatomy and the natural history of those cancers. They require the fusion of the planning CT with preoperative imaging for accurate positioning of the initial GTV and the combined use of the geometric and anatomical concepts for the delineation of clinical target volume for the primary tumour. This article does not discuss the indications of external radiotherapy (nor concurrent systemic treatment) but focuses on target volumes when there is an indication for radiotherapy.

Management of oligometastatic/metastatic sarcomas and place of local treatments with focus on modern radiotherapy approaches.

Soft tissue sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous disease. For localized disease, treatment is based on surgery and radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy depending on risk factors. Upfront metastases are present in 7 to 20% of cases, and are localized to the lungs in most of cases. Disseminated disease is generally considered incurable but in selected cases, aggressive local treatment of metastases allowed long survival. Treatment of primary tumour is often debated. Our purpose is to evaluate the literature concerning the role of radiotherapy in the management of primary metastatic soft tissue sarcomas.

Management of head and neck carcinomas with synchronous or metachronous oligometastatic disease: Role of locoregional radiotherapy and metastasis-directed radiotherapy.

Head and neck carcinomas are initially metastatic in about 15% of cases. Radiotherapy is a cornerstone in the multimodal strategy at the locoregional phase. In patients with head and neck cancer, often heavily pretreated and with comorbidities, who relapse locoregionally or at distant sites, radiotherapy has also become increasingly important at the metastatic phase. Data on the optimal sequence of systemic treatments and metastasis-directed treatments including stereotactic irradiation are still lacking. Several randomized head and neck trials have been initiated that should provide important answers, including one recent GORTEC trial.

Systemic therapies for salivary gland carcinoma (excluding adenoid cystic carcinoma): REFCOR recommendations by the formal consensus method.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the therapeutic indications for systemic medical treatment in the management of salivary gland carcinoma (excluding adenoid cystic carcinoma) according to the clinical situation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The French Network of Rare Head and Neck Tumors (REFCOR) formed a steering group who drafted a narrative review of the literature published on Medline and proposed recommendations. The level of adherence to the recommendations was then assessed by a rating group, according to the formal consensus method. RESULTS: Salivary gland carcinoma is rare and there is currently insufficient evidence to indicate chemotherapy at the localized stage. At the metastatic stage, initial management can be based on a phase of monitoring for indolent disease. Some histological subtypes (salivary duct carcinoma and adenocarcinoma) are more aggressive and require systemic treatment from the outset. To guide systemic treatment, it is recommended to perform immunohistochemistry and molecular biology analyses (overexpression of HER2 and androgen receptors, NTRK fusion, next-generation sequencing). CONCLUSION: Salivary gland carcinoma is a rare tumor for which there are currently few effective medical treatments. It is therefore recommended to include patients in clinical trials.

Systemic therapies for salivary gland cancer: Adenoid cystic carcinoma. REFCOR recommendations by the formal consensus method.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the therapeutic indications for systemic medical treatment in the management of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) according to the clinical situation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The French Network of Rare Head and Neck Tumors (REFCOR) formed a steering group, which drafted a narrative review of the literature published on Medline and proposed recommendations. The level of adherence to the recommendations was then assessed by a rating group, according to the formal consensus method. RESULTS: ACCs are rare tumors and there is currently insufficient evidence to indicate chemotherapy at the localized stage. At the metastatic stage, progression is often slow. In case of oligometastatic ACC, local treatment should be discussed. The most often indolent nature of polymetastatic ACC can allow management by active surveillance. Molecular screening is recommended, for abnormalities potentially accessible to targeted therapy. CONCLUSION: ACCs are rare tumors for which there are currently few effective medical treatments. It is therefore recommended to include patients in clinical trials.

Radiotherapy for salivary gland cancer: REFCOR recommendations by the formal consensus method.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the indications for radiotherapy in salivary gland cancer and to specify the modalities and target radiation volumes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The French Network of Rare Head and Neck Tumors (REFCOR) formed a steering group which drafted a narrative review of the literature published on Medline and proposed recommendations. The level of adherence to the recommendations was then assessed by a rating group, according to the formal consensus method. RESULTS: Postoperatively, radiotherapy to the primary tumor site±to the lymph nodes is indicated if one or more of the following adverse histoprognostic factors are present (risk>10% of locoregional recurrence): T3-T4 category, lymph node invasion, extraglandular invasion, close or positive surgical margins, high tumor grade, perineural invasion, vascular emboli, and/or bone invasion. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is the gold standard. For unresectable cancers or inoperable patients, carbon ion hadrontherapy may be considered. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy in salivary gland cancer is indicated in postoperative situations in case of adverse histoprognostic factors and for inoperable tumors.

[High energy proton therapy for extraocular tumors, neurotrophic keratitis and functional consequence: A series of 3 cases]. / Protonthérapie haute énergie des tumeurs extra-oculaires, kératite neurotrophique et conséquence fonctionnelle : une série de 3 cas.

INTRODUCTION: High energy proton therapy (HEP) is a form of radiation therapy using protons for extraocular tumors. Its ballistic properties are theoretically advantageous, but the real impact on the surrounding ocular tissues during cerebral and ENT irradiation is poorly documented. We describe three consecutive patients with corneal damage following such irradiation. MATERIALS/METHODS: Post-proton therapy neurotrophic keratitis (NK) is defined as corneal hypo/anesthesia responsible for an alteration of corneal trophicity and graded according to the Mackie classification, in terms of a prospective ophthalmological follow-up protocol for all patients with extraocular tumors treated with HEP. RESULTS: Among 193 patients treated with HEP between 2018 and 2021 for extraocular tumors, three patients developed severe neurotrophic keratitis, i.e. 1.6% of treated patients. According to the Mackie classification, the three patients showed grade 3 NK less than one year after the conclusion of their HEP. These three patients underwent amniotic membrane grafting. They were placed on autologous serum eye drops. Two of the three patients had to be eviscerated. The dose to the cornea was greater than 50 Gray (Gy)_Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in the three cases. DISCUSSION: The diagnosis and etiological origin of neurotrophic keratitis are often difficult to establish. In these cases, the imputability of radiation therapy, proton therapy in our cases, in the development of neurotrophic keratitis was plausible based on the dosimetry of the patients, all of whom had anterior tumors with a poor prognosis requiring high tumoricidal doses. CONCLUSION: Further studies to establish the impact of proton therapy on corneal sensitivity are necessary. However, this feedback and the multidisciplinary management of tumors can help to limit the risk of some complications of radiation therapy. Early diagnosis allows for appropriate management and could possibly minimize the anatomical and functional ocular complications of neurotrophic keratitis.

Basic concepts and directions in the radiation therapy quality assurance processes of clinical trials.

The radiation therapy quality assurance of clinical trials is internationally recognized as a key factor to control the quality of radiotherapy for its impact on clinical trial's goals. Quality assessment may be performed at different levels and by different means, which are now quite standardized. The optimal radiation therapy quality assurance of clinical trials trade-off to maintain accrual rates, radiotherapy quality and optimize clinical trial research processes is yet to be defined. This article addresses current definitions, processes, limitations and directions.

Voxel-wise analysis: A powerful tool to predict radio-induced toxicity and potentially perform personalised planning in radiotherapy.

Dose - volume histograms have been historically used to study the relationship between the planned radiation dose and healthy tissue damage. However, this approach considers neither spatial information nor heterogenous radiosensitivity within organs at risk, depending on the tissue. Recently, voxel-wise analyses have emerged in the literature as powerful tools to fully exploit three-dimensional information from the planned dose distribution. They allow to identify anatomical subregions of one or several organs in which the irradiation dose is associated with a given toxicity. These methods rely on an accurate anatomical alignment, usually obtained by means of a non-rigid registration. Once the different anatomies are spatially normalised, correlations between the three-dimensional dose and a given toxicity can be explored voxel-wise. Parametric or non-parametric statistical tests can be performed on every voxel to identify the voxels in which the dose is significantly different between patients presenting or not toxicity. Several anatomical subregions associated with genitourinary, gastrointestinal, cardiac, pulmonary or haematological toxicity have already been identified in the literature for prostate, head and neck or thorax irradiation. Voxel-wise analysis appears therefore first particularly interesting to increase toxicity prediction capability by identifying specific subregions in the organs at risk whose irradiation is highly predictive of specific toxicity. The second interest is potentially to decrease the radio-induced toxicity by limiting the dose in the predictive subregions, while not decreasing the dose in the target volume. Limitations of the approach have been pointed out.

[Real world data in radiotherapy: A data farming project by Unitrad]. / Données de vie réelle en radiothérapie : le data farming du groupe Unitrad.

The aim of the data farming project by the Unitrad group is to produce and use large quantities of structured real-life data throughout radiotherapy treatment. Starting in 2016, target real world data were selected at expert consensus conferences and regularly updated, then captured in MOSAIQ© as the patient was treated. For each partner institution, the data was then stored in a relational database, then extracted and used by researchers to create real world knowledge. This production was carried out in a multicentre, coordinated fashion. When necessary, the raw data was shared according to the research projects, in compliance with regulations. Feedack was provided at each stage, enabling the system to evolve flexibly and rapidly, using the "agile" method. This work, which is constantly evolving, has led to the creation of health data warehouses focused on data of interest in radiotherapy, and the publication of numerous academic studies. It forms part of the wider context of the exploitation of real-life data in cancerology. Unitrad data farming is a collaborative project for creating knowledge from real-life radiotherapy data, based on an active network of clinicians and researchers.

Effect of lymphoid volume irradiation on radiation-induced lymphopenia in head and neck cancers.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy induces significant and prolonged lymphopenia in head and neck cancer patients with poorer outcomes and reduced survival. Irradiated volumes may be correlated with lymphopenia with a potential impact on immunotherapy efficacy. We assessed associations between volumes treated with radiotherapy and the nadir of the lymphocyte count in patients with head and neck cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a monocentric retrospective study in patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiation. Univariate analysis used regression analysis to model nadir lymphocyte count and radiotherapy volumes; multivariate analysis then modelled factors associated with nadir lymphocyte count. RESULTS: Of the 77 included patients, 97% presented lymphopenia during radiotherapy with an average nadir of 431 cells/mm3 at a median of 40 days after the beginning of treatment. The volume of high-risk radiotherapy and gross tumour volume were correlated with nadir lymphocyte count with a Spearman coefficient of -0.267 (P=0.019) and -0.387 (P=0.001), respectively. After multivariate linear regression, high-risk radiotherapy was significantly associated with nadir lymphocyte count with a regression coefficient of -0.32 (per cubic centimetre) [95% CI=-0.60; -0.03] (P=0.028). CONCLUSION: High-risk radiotherapy was significantly associated with nadir lymphocyte count in patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiation. Sparing lymphoid volumes from irradiation by elective nodal irradiation or proton therapy may limit lymphopenia and needs to be investigated in combination with immunotherapy.

Systematic dosimetric evaluation of risk of osteoradionecrosis (DERO): First results of dose reporting for preventing teeth osteoradionecrosis after head and neck irradiation.

PURPOSE: OsteoRadioNecrosis (ORN) is a late complication of radiation for head and neck cancer. Predicting ORN is a major challenge. We developed DERO (Dosimetric Evaluation of Risk of ORN), a semi-automatic tool which reports doses delivered to tooth-bearing sectors, to guide post-therapeutic dental care. We present the method and the first results of a 125-patient prospective cohort. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Dosimetric data of patients treated with IMRT for head and neck cancer were prospectively segmented to the DERO algorithm. Four arches corresponding to 8-tooth sectors were semi-automatically generated. Thirty-two cylindrical Regions Of Interest (ROI) corresponding to each tooth and surrounding periodontium were created by linear interpolation. Mean doses (Dmean) of ROI were extracted and included in a database, along with data about primary tumor site, laterality and dose values from organs at risk. Dmean to tooth sectors were computed for molar sectors, (teeth X5 to X8) and anterior sectors (teeth X1 to X4). An individual dose map was generated and delivered to patients and dentists. RESULTS: Dosimetric data from 125 patients treated with Tomotherapy® were prospectively collected and analyzed: 9 parotid tumors (PA), 41 Sub-Hyoid tumors (larynx, hypopharynx) (SH), 43 Oropharynx tumors (OR), 32 Oral Cavity tumors (OC). Irradiation was unilateral for 100% of PA tumors (9), 12% of OR tumors (5) and 47% of OC tumors (15). For unilateral cervical irradiation, Dmean in ipsilateral molar sectors was 54Gy for OC tumors, 45Gy for OR tumors, 20Gy for PA tumors. For Oral Cavity bilateral irradiation, Dmean was high in all tooth sectors, 49 to 55Gy. For SH tumors, Dmean in molar sectors was 27Gy. A dose gradient of 10 to 20Gy was observed between molar and anterior sectors whether radiation was uni or bilateral. CONCLUSION: Mandibular molar sectors of Oropharynx and Oral Cavity tumors were exposed to high Dmean of 40 to 50Gy. On the other hand, tooth sectors received lower doses for SH radiation. The DERO tool guide post-radiation dental care with a personalized dosimetric cartography to patient. With data update and patient follow-up, we will be able to determine ORN risk after head and neck radiation.

Supraventricular cardiac conduction system exposure in breast cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and association with heart and cardiac chambers doses.

Purpose: To assess sinoatrial node (SAN) and atrioventricular node (AVN) doses for breast cancer (BC) patients treated with 3D-CRT and evaluate whether "large" cardiac structures (whole heart and four cardiac chambers) would be relevant surrogates. Material and methods: This single center study was based on 116 BCE patients (56 left-sided, 60 right-sided) treated with 3D-CRT without respiratory gating strategies and few IMN irradiations from 2009 to 2013. The heart, the left and right ventricles (LV, RV), the left and right atria (LA, RA) were contoured using multi-atlases for auto-segmentation. The SAN and the AVN were manually delineated using a specific atlas. Based on regression analysis, the coefficients of determination (R2) were estimated to evaluate whether "large" cardiac structures were relevant surrogates (R2 > 0.70) of SAN and AVN doses. Results: For left-sided BC, mean doses were: 3.60 ± 2.28 Gy for heart, 0.47 ± 0.24 Gy for SAN and 0.74 ± 0.29 Gy for AVN. For right-sided BC, mean heart dose was 0.60 ± 0.25 Gy, mean SAN dose was 1.57 ± 0.63 Gy (>85 % of patients with SAN doses > 1 Gy) and mean AVN dose was 0.51 ± 0.14 Gy. Among all "large" cardiac structures, RA appeared as the best surrogate for SAN doses (R2 > 0.80). Regarding AVN doses, the RA may also be an interesting surrogate for left-sided BC (R2 = 0.78), but none of "large" cardiac structures appeared as relevant surrogates among right-sided BC (all R2 < 0.70), except the LA for patients with IMN (R2 = 0.83). Conclusions: In BC patients treated 10 years ago with 3D-CRT, SAN and AVN exposure was moderate but could exceed 1 Gy to the SAN in many right-sided patients with no IMN-inclusion. The RA appeared as an interesting surrogate for SAN exposure. Specific conduction nodes delineation remains necessary by using modern radiotherapy techniques.

AFSOS-SFRO-SFH-SFNEP-SFCE-GFRP guidelines on radio-induced nausea and vomiting.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of radiation-induced nausea and vomiting varies between 40% and 80%. They have many consequences on treatment and comorbidities. This work thus aimed to define clinical practice guidelines for the management of radiation-induced nausea and vomiting. METHODS: XXXXX, XXXX, XXX, XXXXX, XXXX and XXXX compiled a working group who draft these recommendations. RESULTS: The assessment of the emetogenic risk found two main predictive factors: 1) the irradiated anatomical location, 2) an associated concomitant chemotherapy. In the case of exclusive radiotherapy, primary antiemetic prophylaxis depends on the emetogenic risk (the irradiated anatomical location). In the case of concomitant chemotherapy, the emetogenic risk is generally higher and the primary antiemetic prophylaxis corresponds to that of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. In cases where symptoms persist, remedial treatments are poorly codified. CONCLUSION: Radiation-induced nausea and vomiting remains underdiagnosed and undertreated, its rapid detection and treatment are essential to reinstate good clinical practice.

Reirradiation: A complex situation.

Reirradiation of a tumor recurrence or second cancer in a previously irradiated area is challenging due to lack of high-quality physical, radiobiological, clinical data and inherent substantial risks of toxicity with cumulative dose and uncertain tissue recovery. Yet, major advances have been made in radiotherapy techniques, that have the potential to achieve cure while limiting severe toxicity rates, but still much research is necessary to better appraise the therapeutic index in such a complex situation.

30 years of ocular proton therapy, the Nice view.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy with protons (PT) is a standard treatment of ocular tumors. It achieves excellent tumor control, limited toxicities, and the preservation of important functional outcomes, such as vision. Although PT may appear as one homogenous technique, it can be performed using dedicated ocular passive scattering PT or, increasingly, Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS), both with various degrees of patient-oriented customization. MATERAIAL AND METHODS: MEDICYC PT facility of Nice are detailed with respect to their technical, dosimetric, microdosimetric and radiobiological, patient and tumor-customization process of PT planning and delivery that are key. 6684 patients have been treated for ocular tumors (1991-2020). Machine characteristics (accelerator, beam line, beam monitoring) allow efficient proton extraction, high dose rate, sharp lateral and distal penumbrae, and limited stray radiation in comparison to beam energy reduction and subsequent straggling with high-energy PBS PT. Patient preparation before PT includes customized setup and image-guidance, CT-based planning, and ocular PT software modelling of the patient eye with integration of beam modifiers. Clinical reports have shown excellent tumor control rates (∼95%), vision preservation and limited toxicity rates (papillopathy, retinopathy, neovascular glaucoma, dry eye, madarosis, cataract). RESULTS: Although demanding, dedicated ocular PT has proven its efficiency in achieving excellent tumor control, OAR sparing and patient radioprotection. It is therefore worth adaptations of the equipments and practice. CONCLUSIONS: Some of these adaptations can be transferred to other PT centers and should be acknowledeged when using non-PT options.

Ocular proton therapy, pencil beam scanning high energy proton therapy or stereotactic radiotherapy for uveal melanoma; an in silico study.

PURPOSE: In radiotherapy, the dose and volumes of the irradiated normal tissues is correlated to the complication rate. We assessed the performances of low-energy proton therapy (ocular PT) with eye-dedicated equipment, high energy PT with pencil-beam scanning (PBS) or CyberKnifeR  -based stereotactic irradiation (SBRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: CT-based comparative dose distribution between external beam radiotherapy techniques was assessed using an anthropomorphic head phantom. The prescribed dose was 60Gy_RBE in 4 fractions to a typical posterior pole uveal melanoma. Clinically relevant structures were delineated, and doses were calculated using radiotherapy treatment planning softwares and measured using Gafchromic dosimetry films inserted at the ocular level. RESULTS: Precision was significantly better with ocular PT than both PBS or SBRT in terms of beam penumbra (80%-20%: laterally 1.4 vs. ≥10mm, distally 0.8 vs. ≥2.5mm). Ocular PT duration was shorter, allowing eye gating and lid sparing more easily. Tumor was excellent with all modalities, but ocular PT resulted in more homogenous and conformal dose compared to PBS or SBRT. The maximal dose to ocular/orbital structures at risk was smaller and often null with ocular PT compared to other modalities. Mean dose to ocular/orbital structures was also lower with ocular PT. Structures like the lids and lacrimal punctum could be preserved with ocular PT using gaze orientation and lid retractors, which is easier to implement clinically than with the other modalities. The dose to distant organs was null with ocular PT and PBS, in contrast to SBRT. CONCLUSIONS: ocular PT showed significantly improved beam penumbra, shorter treatment delivery time, better dose homogeneity, and reduced maximal/mean doses to critical ocular structures compared with other current external beam radiation modalities. Similar comparisons may be warranted for other tumor presentations.

[Radiation-induced retinopathy: actual knowledge and new concepts]. / La rétinopathie radique : données actuelles et perspectives.

Radiation retinopathy is an occlusive vascular pathology following radiotherapy, generally targeted on the eye or peri-ocular structures. Despite increasingly precise techniques (stereotactic radiosurgery, proton therapy, etc.), the inclusion of the retina in the radiation field is sometimes unavoidable. This can lead to a severe pathology, which can ultimately cause blindness or even the anatomical loss of the eye when neovascular glaucoma occurs, due to the abnormal proliferation of neovessels. Radiation retinopathy have been described for more than a century, but it has recently seen great advances in both diagnosis and treatment. The advances of efficient and less invasive examinations in our clinical practice, such as OCT-angiography, allows for easier screening and diagnosis at earlier stages. Thus a new approach to the pathology is necessary, first of all through new definitions and classifications including previously undetected minimal forms. Furthermore, the recent appearance of intravitreal therapies by injection of anti-VEGF or dexamethasone implants has drastically changed the visual prognosis of these patients, who were previously treated only by retinal photocoagulation of the ischaemic areas. Recent studies have even shown the effectiveness of these new molecules in preventing the development of radiation retinopathy. This review of the literature provides an update on this disease and details how these recent diagnostic and therapeutic developments may play a role in the management of this complication.

Impact of radiotherapy on survival in resected or unresectable anaplastic thyroid carcinomas, a Rare Cancer Network study.

PURPOSE: Anaplastic thyroid carcinomas (ATC) are a heterogenous group of tumors of overall dismal prognosis. We designed models to identify relevant prognostic factors of survival of irradiated ATC patients including radiotherapy modalities (field size, dose). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2000 and 2017, 166 ATC patients' treatments were divided into surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (poRT) or definitive radiotherapy (RT). Multiple imputation approach was used for missing data. Prognostic factors were identified using Lasso-penalized Cox modelling and predicted risk scores were built. RESULTS: Patients undergoing RT (n=70) had more adverse patient and disease characteristics than those undergoing poRT (n=96). Corresponding median survival rates were 5.4 and 12.1 months, respectively. PoRT patients undergoing poRT more likely received extended-field radiotherapy with prophylactic nodal irradiation, but rather received platinum- vs. adriamycin-based chemoradiotherapy. Radiotherapy was conventionally fractionated, delivered >60Gy in 51.9% and 61.7% and used extended fields in 88.5% and 71.2% of patients with poRT or RT. Radiotherapy interruption rates for toxicity were similar in the two groups. The best poRT-group model identified age>45yo, PS≥1, pathologic tumor stage≥pT4b,>N1 and R2 resection as poor prognostic factors. The best RT-group model (C-index of 0.72) identified PS≥3,>N1 and extended-field radiotherapy with prophylactic nodal irradiation (as opposed to tumour-bed irradiation only) as poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing poRT, radiotherapy parameters had little influence over their survival irrespective of patient, disease characteristics, and quality of resection. In patients undergoing RT, extended-field radiotherapy improved survival in addition to PS and nodal stage.

Risk of pacemaker implantation after radiotherapy for breast cancer: A study based on French nationwide health care database sample.

BACKGROUND: Among cardiac complications of breast cancer radiotherapy (BC RT), there are very limited data on arrhythmia and conduction disorders, in particular severe cases requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI). Therefore, this exploratory study aimed to evaluate the risk of PPMI for BC patients treated with RT, compared with the general population and with BC patients not treated with RT. METHODS: The study was performed on a 1/97 representative sample of the French health care database (EGB database). Adult women with a first BC treated with or without RT between 2008 and 2016 were included, followed until 2018, and de novo PPMI were identified. We compared the PPMI incidence in BC cohort relative to the general population with standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and evaluated the risk of PPMI in RT patients compared to patients without RT with a competing risk survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 3853 BCE patients were included. Among BC patients treated with RT, 28 PPMI cases were observed compared with 13 expected cases, corresponding to a SIR of 2.18 [95% CI: 1.45-3.06]. For BC patients not treated with RT, the SIR was 1.01 [95% CI: 0.40-1.90]. Patients treated with RT showed a borderline significant higher risk of PPMI compared with those not treated with RT (subdistribution Hazard Ratio = 2.08, 95% CI 0.87-4.97, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Our exploratory findings indicate that, over the last decade in France, BC patients treated with RT appeared to be at higher risk of PPMI than general population. Further studies are needed to expand on this topic.